UPDATE:如果我使用的libC++編譯,然後我發現了錯誤,但是當我改變了編譯器與libstdC++(GNU C++標準庫),程序將不顯示任何錯誤運行。升壓線壞訪問
我從升壓網站嘗試一些示例代碼,當運行這段代碼不知何故,我得到一個壞訪問錯誤。代碼運行良好,直到它調用它看起來的析構函數。
-lmysqlclient
-lm
-lz
-lboost_date_time
-lboost_system
-lboost_filesystem
鏈接。
有沒有人知道我做錯了什麼?
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/asio.hpp>
#include <boost/thread/thread.hpp>
#include <boost/bind.hpp>
#include <boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time.hpp>
class printer
{
public:
printer(boost::asio::io_service& io)
: strand_(io),
timer1_(io, boost::posix_time::seconds(1)),
timer2_(io, boost::posix_time::seconds(1)),
count_(0)
{
timer1_.async_wait(strand_.wrap(boost::bind(&printer::print1, this)));
timer2_.async_wait(strand_.wrap(boost::bind(&printer::print2, this)));
}
~printer()
{
std::cout << "Final count is " << count_ << "\n";
}
void print1()
{
if (count_ < 10)
{
std::cout << "Timer 1: " << count_ << "\n";
++count_;
timer1_.expires_at(timer1_.expires_at() + boost::posix_time::seconds(1));
timer1_.async_wait(strand_.wrap(boost::bind(&printer::print1, this)));
}
}
void print2()
{
if (count_ < 10)
{
std::cout << "Timer 2: " << count_ << "\n";
++count_;
timer2_.expires_at(timer2_.expires_at() + boost::posix_time::seconds(1));
timer2_.async_wait(strand_.wrap(boost::bind(&printer::print2, this)));
}
}
private:
boost::asio::strand strand_;
boost::asio::deadline_timer timer1_;
boost::asio::deadline_timer timer2_;
int count_;
};
int main()
{
boost::asio::io_service io;
printer p(io);
boost::thread t(boost::bind(&boost::asio::io_service::run, &io));
io.run();
t.join();
return 0;
}
林不知道這是否是一個堆棧跟蹤...
當我在VS 2010中執行此操作時,沒有訪問衝突。奇。 – 2013-03-16 09:52:12
代碼中沒有看到任何錯誤。當您僅鏈接到所需的最小子庫時,是否還存在訪問違規? – 2013-03-16 14:16:20
附上一個調試器,並在程序收到BUS或SEGV信號時向我們顯示堆棧跟蹤信息。 – 2013-03-16 14:40:25