我目前正在通過Type-Driven Development with Idris書。索引的類型與包含idris類型
我在第6章中有兩個與示例數據存儲設計有關的問題。數據存儲是一個命令行應用程序,允許用戶設置存儲哪種數據,然後添加新數據。
以下是代碼的相關部分(稍加簡化)。你可以看到在Github上full code:
module Main
import Data.Vect
infixr 4 .+.
-- This datatype is to define what sorts of data can be contained in the data store.
data Schema
= SString
| SInt
| (.+.) Schema Schema
-- This is a type-level function that translates a Schema to an actual type.
SchemaType : Schema -> Type
SchemaType SString = String
SchemaType SInt = Int
SchemaType (x .+. y) = (SchemaType x, SchemaType y)
-- This is the data store. It can potentially be storing any sort of schema.
record DataStore where
constructor MkData
schema : Schema
size : Nat
items : Vect size (SchemaType schema)
-- This adds new data to the datastore, making sure that the new data is
-- the same type that the DataStore holds.
addToStore
: (dataStore : DataStore) -> SchemaType (schema dataStore) -> DataStore
addToStore (MkData schema' size' store') newitem =
MkData schema' _ (addToData store')
where
addToData
: Vect size' (SchemaType schema') -> Vect (size' + 1) (SchemaType schema')
addToData xs = xs ++ [newitem]
-- These are commands the user can use on the command line. They are able
-- to change the schema, and add new data.
data Command : Schema -> Type where
SetSchema : (newSchema : Schema) -> Command schema
Add : SchemaType schema -> Command schema
-- Given a Schema, this parses input from the user into a Command.
parse : (schema : Schema) -> String -> Maybe (Command schema)
-- This is the main workhorse of the application. It parses user
-- input, turns it into a command, then evaluates the command and
-- returns an updated DataStore.
processInput
: (dataStore : DataStore) -> String -> Maybe (String, DataStore)
processInput [email protected](MkData schema' size' items') input =
case parse schema' input of
Nothing => Just ("Invalid command\n", dataStore)
Just (SetSchema newSchema) =>
Just ("updated schema and reset datastore\n", MkData newSchema _ [])
Just (Add item) =>
let newStore = addToStore (MkData schema' size' items') item
in Just ("ID " ++ show (size dataStore) ++ "\n", newStore)
-- This kicks off processInput with an empty datastore and a simple Schema
-- of SString.
main : IO()
main = replWith (MkData SString _ []) "Command: " processInput
這是有道理的,易於使用,但有一件事竊聽我關於設計。 爲什麼DataStore
包含Schema
而不是被一個索引?
因爲DataStore
不是由Schema
索引,我們可以寫一個不正確的addToStore
功能是這樣的:
addToStore
: (dataStore : DataStore) -> SchemaType (schema dataStore) -> DataStore
addToStore _ newitem =
MkData SInt _ []
這裏是我的想象更安全的代碼會是什麼樣子。你可以看到full code在Github上:
module Main
import Data.Vect
infixr 4 .+.
data Schema
= SString
| SInt
| (.+.) Schema Schema
SchemaType : Schema -> Type
SchemaType SString = String
SchemaType SInt = Int
SchemaType (x .+. y) = (SchemaType x, SchemaType y)
record DataStore (schema : Schema) where
constructor MkData
size : Nat
items : Vect size (SchemaType schema)
addToStore
: (dataStore : DataStore schema) ->
SchemaType schema ->
DataStore schema
addToStore {schema} (MkData size' store') newitem =
MkData _ (addToData store')
where
addToData
: Vect size' (SchemaType schema) -> Vect (size' + 1) (SchemaType schema)
addToData xs = xs ++ [newitem]
data Command : Schema -> Type where
SetSchema : (newSchema : Schema) -> Command schema
Add : SchemaType schema -> Command schema
parse : (schema : Schema) -> String -> Maybe (Command schema)
processInput
: (schema : Schema ** DataStore schema) ->
String ->
Maybe (String, (newschema ** DataStore newschema))
processInput (schema ** (MkData size' items')) input =
case parse schema input of
Nothing => Just ("Invalid command\n", (_ ** MkData size' items'))
Just (SetSchema newSchema) =>
Just ("updated schema and reset datastore\n", (newSchema ** MkData _ []))
Just (Add item) =>
let newStore = addToStore (MkData size' items') item
msg = "ID " ++ show (size newStore) ++ "\n"
in Just (msg, (schema ** newStore))
main : IO()
main = replWith (SString ** MkData _ []) "Command: " processInput
這裏是我的兩個問題:
爲什麼不書中使用
DataStore
型的多類型安全的版本(一個由Schema
索引)?使用較少的類型安全版本(僅包含Schema
)會獲得什麼嗎?一個類型被另一個類型與另一個類型索引的理論差異是什麼?這種差異是否會根據您正在使用的語言而改變?例如,我想在Idris中可能沒有太大的區別,但是Haskell有很大的不同。 (Right ...?)
我剛剛開始與Idris玩耍(我對Haskell中單身人士或GADT的使用並不十分熟悉),所以我很難把頭繞在身邊這個。如果你能指點我的任何文件談論這個,我會非常感興趣。
@Shersh和OP:作者實際上在本書後面詳細介紹了這種轉變(參見10.3.2節)。這裏是[書中的代碼](https://github.com/edwinb/TypeDD-Samples/blob/a5c08a13e6a6ec804171526aca10aae946588323/第10章/ DataStore.idr#L17) –
@AntonTrunov這證明這種轉變更好。也許第一個選擇是爲了簡單。 – Shersh
@Shersh嗯,我認爲它主要是一個品味問題。就我個人而言,我更喜歡簡單的數據類型,其中有幾個關於它的使用的引理。這樣你就可以編寫你的代碼,並稍後證明它的一些性質。就像你可以使用列表一樣,編寫你的程序ML-(或Haskell-)風格,然後再證明它們的一些東西,或者你可以使用臭名昭着的數據類型作爲向量,在這種情況下,你甚至不能說明它的值的屬性我的意思是不使用異質平等,又名約翰大公平)。參見例如[這個答案](https://stackoverflow.com/a/30159566/2747511)。 –